Conxfolio beside Novorésumé

Their free tier has published limits and their paid plans have published prices. Both are quoted from their own pages here, with links, beside a tool that has no tiers at all.

ConxfolioPublished 2026-09-12

— read their page, then ours.

Novorésumé is a well-designed résumé builder with a free tier that has published boundaries. That is the most useful kind of competitor to compare against, because the boundaries are stated on their own page rather than discovered at the download button.

Their side of this page comes from Novorésumé's pricing page and their templates page, both read on 12 September 2026.

What their pages state

The Basic plan is free, and their pricing page lists what it includes: a single version, a maximum one-page résumé, predefined layouts, no cover letter, three fonts and thirty colour themes. It also states that the only difference is that downloading a document with Premium features is not possible in the Basic account.

Premium is listed at €24.99 a month, €49.99 a quarter and €189.99 a year, with the page stating no automatic subscription and payment once rather than recurring billing, which is a genuinely friendlier arrangement than an auto-renewing trial. Their templates page describes all of their résumé templates as free templates, and notes that all of their templates are one page long while being flexible enough to go to two.

The limit worth thinking about

The one-page ceiling on the free tier is the interesting one, because it is a commercial boundary placed on a document decision. Whether your résumé should be one page or two is a question about how much relevant work you have, not about a plan, and it has a real answer that changes with career stage. The page-length guide covers it, and the length guide covers the underlying judgement.

There is no page limit here. A document is as long as your material needs, and the second page is a decision you make rather than one a tier makes for you.

What this side is

The résumé builder renders your content into any of 37 designs, 21 of them marked ATS-safe, with typography and colour controls and no locked cards in the gallery. The cover letter builder is included and free, in 12 designs, and it writes from evidence in your résumé rather than from a template of phrases.

The checker prints the arithmetic behind its score, and the portfolio builder produces a real page with an address you can claim. All of it free, with no account.

Side by side

Where they fit better

Their design sensibility is strong and specific, and design preference is not a thing anybody should be argued out of. If you looked at both galleries and preferred theirs, that is the whole decision, and the one-page constraint suits a large number of people anyway. Their pay-once arrangement also avoids the trap a subscription usually sets.

Where this fits better

A longer document, a free cover letter, a check that shows its working, and a portfolio page in the same place. And the lack of a tier boundary at all, which matters most at the moment you are finishing rather than starting.

Check both

Download whatever each tool gives you and run both files through the checker, free and with no account. Read the words, lines and recognised headings each one extracted. That measurement is about your document rather than about either company, and it is the part of this comparison that will actually change what you send.

Design preference is a real reason

Most comparisons in this category pretend the decision is about features, and for a large share of people it is about which gallery they would rather their work sit in. That is a legitimate basis for choosing, and no table settles it. Both galleries are free to look at, so look at both with your own name and your own headline in mind.

What a table can settle is what happens after the design choice: whether the file is free, whether the document can be two pages, and whether anything checks the result. Those are the lines above, and the sources are linked so you can read their page rather than our summary of it. If you want the same treatment applied to a design-led competitor, the Enhancv comparison quotes their own pricing page on branding.

Moving a document from one to the other

Download whatever the other tool will give you, in whatever format it offers, and import that file here. It is read in your browser and the review lists every field beside the text it came from, so even a plain text export becomes a structured document in one correcting pass rather than a retyping session.

Then choose a design and export both formats. If the file you are starting from is a scan or a photograph rather than a text document, the reading path is different and the losses are real, which checking a scanned résumé measures rather than describes.